metadata is kept inside the file, as exif & or IPTC data even if you copy or move
or make an picture a public image in icloud photo library & or many online sites
my pinned comment said
show you are the original person in contact with P…
metadata is kept inside the file, as exif & or IPTC data even if you copy or move
or make an picture a public image in icloud photo library & or many online sites
my pinned comment said
show you are the original person in contact with Pedrocultas
2024/06/06 i get carmellolb200 carmellolb 2016, claims as
I am the original person I had the file in my library since I was a kid
i downloaded it browsing random websites which I don't remember.
I don't have to prove myself anymore because the
date is the same in the real image they found!!),
&
this leads to
archive.is/wky0I = instagram with no backrooms references?
archive.is/kJb8Q = unreachable site with no backrooms references?
archive.is/m2im9 = deviantart with no backrooms references?
archive.ph/CYWBU = github with no backrooms references?
archive.ph/gtBeD = carmellolb site with no backrooms references?
archive.is/EeEeh = youtube channel UCefWHFsxVBYRQHcUihXQnQg &
archive.ph/V3zSK = youtube about page with no backrooms references?
BUT then
archive.is/MwpnD = 16:58 & 18:43 UTC 2 posts reddit user &
archive.ph/bSMbJ = 12:22 - 12:30 am 5 posts lostmediawiki say
"I can't believe not a single person is willing to credit" me ?!!
so i say
what did you mene by "my library" & "since 2014 " etc
so 2024-06-11 i get
pedrocultas vid referenced a person who said
they had a photo in their library since sep 2014
I didn't directly contact him
it was in my 2014 icloud photo library & reupload to catbox moe &
2020 - 2021 i posted on the backrooms discord & was disbelieved
support.apple.com/en-us/118229
discussions.apple.com/thread/252437117?sortBy=best
archive.is/EWtVn
= most citation archives MUNGED due to youtube link bot & censor flag threats
don't, rate, comment, subscribe, or hit the bell, till you pause this & read the title & description.
my work is transformative in nature as criticism so some usage of the original is required but
uses no more of the original than..
